Honest People Tend to Use Less - Not More - Profanity: Comment on Feldman et al.'s (2017) Study 1

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Reinout E. de Vries
  • Benjamin E. Hilbig
  • Zettler, Ingo
  • Patrick D. Dunlop
  • Djurre Holtrop
  • Kibeom Lee
  • Michael C. Ashton
This article shows that the conclusion of Feldman et al.’s (2017) Study 1 that profane individuals tend to be honest is most likely incorrect. We argue that Feldman et al.’s conclusion is based on a commonly held but erroneous assumption that higher scores on Impression Management Scales, such as the Lie Scale, are associated with trait dishonesty. Based on evidence from studies that have investigated (1) self-other agreement on Impression Management Scales, (2) the relation of Impression Management Scales with personality variables, and (3) the relation of Impression Management Scales with objective measures of cheating, we show that high scores on Impression Management Scales are associated with high—instead of low—trait honesty when measured in low-stakes conditions. Furthermore, using two data sets that included an “I never swear” item, we show that profanity use is negatively related to other reports of HEXACO honesty-humility and positively related to actual cheating.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume9
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)516-520
Number of pages5
ISSN1948-5506
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

    Research areas

  • personality, honesty, impression management, Lie Scale, profanity

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 210065607