Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. / Makransky, Guido; Terkildsen, Thomas S.; Mayer, Richard E.

In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 61, 01.06.2019, p. 23-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Makransky, G, Terkildsen, TS & Mayer, RE 2019, 'Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect', Learning and Instruction, vol. 61, pp. 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001

APA

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. Learning and Instruction, 61, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001

Vancouver

Makransky G, Terkildsen TS, Mayer RE. Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. Learning and Instruction. 2019 Jun 1;61:23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001

Author

Makransky, Guido ; Terkildsen, Thomas S. ; Mayer, Richard E. / Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect. In: Learning and Instruction. 2019 ; Vol. 61. pp. 23-34.

Bibtex

@article{9c793c79324d445798816d200856e0a9,
title = "Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect",
abstract = "The main objective of this study was to investigate the potential of combining subjective and objective measures of learning process to uncover the mechanisms underlying the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. The subjective measures of learning process were self-reported cognitive load ratings and the objective measures were eye-tracking and EEG measures. Learning outcome was measured by scores on retention and transfer posttests. A sample of 78 university students participated in a between-subjects design in which a multimedia slideshow lesson on how lightning storms develop was presented either with printed text as a caption at the bottom of each illustration (separated presentation) or with printed text placed next to the corresponding part of each illustration (integrated presentation). Regarding spatial contiguity, the integrated group spent significantly more time looking at the text (d = 0.64), but significantly less time looking at irrelevant illustrations (d = 1.10), and reported a significantly lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.57), compared to the separated group. As expected, they also scored significantly higher on the transfer test (d = 0.49). Students who performed best on posttests reported a lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.56). Furthermore, EEG based alpha band activity was predictive of intrinsic cognitive load but not predictive of extraneous cognitive load, and EEG based theta activity was not predictive of intrinsic or extraneous load. The results suggest that subjective and objective measures of cognitive load can provide different information to test the theoretical mechanisms involved in multimedia learning.",
keywords = "Cognitive load, EEG, Eye tracking, Multimedia learning, Spatial contiguity",
author = "Guido Makransky and Terkildsen, {Thomas S.} and Mayer, {Richard E.}",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "23--34",
journal = "Learning and Instruction",
issn = "0959-4752",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of subjective and objective measures of cognitive processing during learning in explaining the spatial contiguity effect

AU - Makransky, Guido

AU - Terkildsen, Thomas S.

AU - Mayer, Richard E.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - The main objective of this study was to investigate the potential of combining subjective and objective measures of learning process to uncover the mechanisms underlying the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. The subjective measures of learning process were self-reported cognitive load ratings and the objective measures were eye-tracking and EEG measures. Learning outcome was measured by scores on retention and transfer posttests. A sample of 78 university students participated in a between-subjects design in which a multimedia slideshow lesson on how lightning storms develop was presented either with printed text as a caption at the bottom of each illustration (separated presentation) or with printed text placed next to the corresponding part of each illustration (integrated presentation). Regarding spatial contiguity, the integrated group spent significantly more time looking at the text (d = 0.64), but significantly less time looking at irrelevant illustrations (d = 1.10), and reported a significantly lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.57), compared to the separated group. As expected, they also scored significantly higher on the transfer test (d = 0.49). Students who performed best on posttests reported a lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.56). Furthermore, EEG based alpha band activity was predictive of intrinsic cognitive load but not predictive of extraneous cognitive load, and EEG based theta activity was not predictive of intrinsic or extraneous load. The results suggest that subjective and objective measures of cognitive load can provide different information to test the theoretical mechanisms involved in multimedia learning.

AB - The main objective of this study was to investigate the potential of combining subjective and objective measures of learning process to uncover the mechanisms underlying the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. The subjective measures of learning process were self-reported cognitive load ratings and the objective measures were eye-tracking and EEG measures. Learning outcome was measured by scores on retention and transfer posttests. A sample of 78 university students participated in a between-subjects design in which a multimedia slideshow lesson on how lightning storms develop was presented either with printed text as a caption at the bottom of each illustration (separated presentation) or with printed text placed next to the corresponding part of each illustration (integrated presentation). Regarding spatial contiguity, the integrated group spent significantly more time looking at the text (d = 0.64), but significantly less time looking at irrelevant illustrations (d = 1.10), and reported a significantly lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.57), compared to the separated group. As expected, they also scored significantly higher on the transfer test (d = 0.49). Students who performed best on posttests reported a lower level of extraneous load (d = 0.56). Furthermore, EEG based alpha band activity was predictive of intrinsic cognitive load but not predictive of extraneous cognitive load, and EEG based theta activity was not predictive of intrinsic or extraneous load. The results suggest that subjective and objective measures of cognitive load can provide different information to test the theoretical mechanisms involved in multimedia learning.

KW - Cognitive load

KW - EEG

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Multimedia learning

KW - Spatial contiguity

U2 - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.001

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85059648823

VL - 61

SP - 23

EP - 34

JO - Learning and Instruction

JF - Learning and Instruction

SN - 0959-4752

ER -

ID: 211806404